Login

GPC Members Login
If you have any problems or have forgotten your login please contact [email protected]


In New Phytologist: EU’s opposition to modern crop breeding could harm trade

New research has found that the European Union’s opposition to modern crop breeding is at odds with the majority of other countries around the world and could jeopardise international trade.

A recent ruling from the European Court of Justice imposed burdensome and expensive approval processes for any new plant varieties using gene-editing techniques, even if changes are indistinguishable from those that could be produced naturally.

An international team of experts argue in New Phytologist that this ruling could hinder the global development of crop plant varieties using new technologies. They compared legislation and regulations on plant breeding in the EU with seven other countries – Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia and the United States.

Lead author Dennis Eriksson from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences said the EU’s political attitude to modern plant breeding approaches was unjustified and out of step with most countries.

“It is now imperative that the EU engages in discussions with all trading partners to avoid unnecessary harm to international trade in agricultural products resulting from the use of modern breeding techniques,” he said.

“Plants developed using gene editing that result in changes that are effectively indistinguishable from what can be obtained using conventional breeding strategies should not be treated any differently under EU law.”

“This could negatively affect the development of more nutritious, stress resilient and higher yield varieties, particularly for public sector-funded projects” said co-author, Chair of the Global Plant Council and Professor at the The Australian National University, Barry Pogson.

The other authors are Drew Kershen from University of Oklahoma in the US, Alexandre Nepomuceno from Brazilian Agricultural Research Cooperation (Embrapa), Humberto Prieto from Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias in Chile, Kai Purnhagen and Justus Wesseler from Wageningen University and University of Rotterdam in the Netherlands, Stuart Smyth from University of Saskatchewan in Canada, and Agustina Whelan from National University of Quilmes in Argentina.

The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra) supported the work through the Mistra Biotech public research programme.

Read the paper: New Phytologist

Image credit: CCO Public domain

Media contact: Isabel Mendoza [email protected]

News

To protect stem cells, plants have diverse genetic backup plans

Despite evolution driving a wide variety of differences, many plants function the same way. Now a new study has revealed the different genetic strategies various flowering plant species use to achieve the same status quo.


Scientists crack the code to regenerate plant tissues

Plant regeneration can occur via formation of a mass of pluripotent cells. The process of acquisition of pluripotency involves silencing of genes to remove original tissue memory and priming for activation by external input. Led by Professor Sachihiro Matsunaga from Tokyo University of Science, a team of scientists have shown that plant regenerative capacity requires a certain demethylase that can prime gene expression in response to regenerative cues.


Pollen Genes Mutate Naturally in Only Some Strains of Corn

Pollen genes mutate naturally in only some strains of corn, according to Rutgers-led research that helps explain the genetic instability in certain strains and may lead to better breeding of corn and other crops.