GPC Members Login
If you have any problems or have forgotten your login please contact [email protected]

In New Phytologist: EU’s opposition to modern crop breeding could harm trade

New research has found that the European Union’s opposition to modern crop breeding is at odds with the majority of other countries around the world and could jeopardise international trade.

A recent ruling from the European Court of Justice imposed burdensome and expensive approval processes for any new plant varieties using gene-editing techniques, even if changes are indistinguishable from those that could be produced naturally.

An international team of experts argue in New Phytologist that this ruling could hinder the global development of crop plant varieties using new technologies. They compared legislation and regulations on plant breeding in the EU with seven other countries – Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia and the United States.

Lead author Dennis Eriksson from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences said the EU’s political attitude to modern plant breeding approaches was unjustified and out of step with most countries.

“It is now imperative that the EU engages in discussions with all trading partners to avoid unnecessary harm to international trade in agricultural products resulting from the use of modern breeding techniques,” he said.

“Plants developed using gene editing that result in changes that are effectively indistinguishable from what can be obtained using conventional breeding strategies should not be treated any differently under EU law.”

“This could negatively affect the development of more nutritious, stress resilient and higher yield varieties, particularly for public sector-funded projects” said co-author, Chair of the Global Plant Council and Professor at the The Australian National University, Barry Pogson.

The other authors are Drew Kershen from University of Oklahoma in the US, Alexandre Nepomuceno from Brazilian Agricultural Research Cooperation (Embrapa), Humberto Prieto from Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias in Chile, Kai Purnhagen and Justus Wesseler from Wageningen University and University of Rotterdam in the Netherlands, Stuart Smyth from University of Saskatchewan in Canada, and Agustina Whelan from National University of Quilmes in Argentina.

The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra) supported the work through the Mistra Biotech public research programme.

Read the paper: New Phytologist

Image credit: CCO Public domain

Media contact: Isabel Mendoza [email protected]


Scientists transform tobacco info factory for high-value proteins

For thousands of years, plants have produced food for humans, but with genetic tweaks, they can also manufacture proteins like Ebola vaccines, antibodies to combat a range of conditions, and now, cellulase that is used in food processing and to break down crop waste to create biofuel. In Nature Plants, a team from Cornell University and the University of Illinois announced that crops can cheaply manufacture proteins inside their cellular power plants called chloroplasts—allowing the crops to be grown widely in fields rather than restrictive greenhouses—with no cost to yield.

Climate change could affect symbiotic relationships between microorganisms and trees

Some fungi and bacteria live in close association, or symbiosis, with tree roots in forest soil to obtain mutual benefits. The microorganisms help trees access water and nutrients from the atmosphere or soil, sequester carbon, and withstand the effects of climate change. In exchange, they receive carbohydrates, which are essential to their development and are produced by the trees during photosynthesis.

Aggressive, non-native wetland plants squelch species richness more than dominant natives do

Dominant, non-native plants reduce wetland biodiversity and abundance more than native plants do, researchers report in the journal Ecology Letters. Even native plants that dominate wetland landscapes play better with others, the team found.